Just as with this 21st-Century hipster discovered at a Canadian bridge dedication in the 1940s, another historical anachronism has been spotted, this time in the 1928 Charlie Chaplin film, The Circus. As reported by the U.K. Daily Mail, a Chaplin film expert discovered an older woman walking alone across the background of a scene in The Circus, and she is talking toward an object she is holding to her ear.
For all the world, she appears to be using a mobile phone. (I highly recommend checking out the Daily Mail link, which includes an embedded video.)
Excitingly, this is the second high-profile anachronistic discovery within the last year, and if “time tourism” really does come into being, we can expect to discover more as the common body of historical material becomes digitized and universally search-able/accessible.
Without any compelling alternative explanations for what it is the woman is doing, it is tempting to leap to the conclusion that this is an legitimate “find.” -And, if we take a moment to deconstruct the logic of such a scenario, interesting issues and implications arise:
- Taking the position that the object is a phone in the hands of a genuine time-traveler, this could not possibly be a standard “cellular” phone. The transmission network to process a signal from modern-day phones wouldn’t come to exist for nearly another 70 years. (So, at the very least, to be useful at that time the device would have to work more like a 2-way radio.) So, is it a “phone” …? Probably not. A communication device? -Plausible.
- Who is she talking to? -Can we now infer that time-travelers, (like all good field explorers,) employ the buddy system?
- Time travel cannot be very physically-demanding, as this woman (appears) to be in relatively ordinary physical condition. (i.e., unlike the time-traveler in the 1940s image, she’s not a young, fit “field” type, and she has evidently made the trip.)
- What are the odds of catching this on film? Would a time traveler be unaware of the filming of a Charlie Chaplin film and be careless enough, (presuming leaving evidence of temporal tinkering is considered to be a bad thing,) to walk in front of the camera? Does this imply an incredible coincidence? -Or are time-travelers ubiquitous in history?
All in all, a very interesting development. -Keep your eyes peeled next time you’re in the local library or museum.