A Dose of Radiation Information
How much radiation is normal?
In light of Fukushima, sensationalized media, political fear-stoking, and rampant misinformation regarding radioactivity, consider this post an easy-to-reference tool/resource. With it, you can be armed to understand and quickly make sense of this over-mystified, natural aspect of reality when it comes up.
For starters, here’s the simple reality about how much radiation you receive in a year just for standing on Planet Earth:
The average annual radiation dose for a U.S. resident is 360 millirem.
- Note: For the international units, divide all “millirem” numbers by 100, (i.e. 3.6 millisieverts.) Or, an online converter can be found here.
However, what does that mean? I’m completely aware that unless you’re a professional in the field of health physics, (as I am,) this number has no context. So, allow me to explain just what this really means using things we can all identify with.
Hold on to your hats.
So, What’s My Dose?
For context, below is a list of the amount of radioactivity you receive in a year from very familiar items/sources:
- Cosmic radiation = 26-96 millirem (higher with altitude)
- From standing on the Earth itself (geology) = 25-90 millirem (higher nearer igneous mountains)
- From your own brick/stone/concrete building = 7 millirem
- From your own body (food/water!) = 40 millirem
- From breathing (naturally-produced radon) = 200 millirem
- For flying 1,000 miles in an airplane = 1 millirem
- From having dental/chest/normal x-rays = 50 millirem
- From having an annual mammogram = 75 millirem
Just add these up to produce your own, custom average annual radiation dose.
Wait. My house/food/body/atmosphere is radioactive?
Yes. Not to fear. Just like the small amounts of chemicals that we can reliably tolerate, (e.g., trace arsenic, lead, etc.,) so too are trace amounts of radioactivity completely tolerable.
Fukushima in Context
Now, as you can see in the above plot of the radioactivity measured at the entrance of Fukushima nuclear powerplant as the disaster happened, it looks pretty dramatic.
- (Note: The numbers are reported in “micro”sieverts per hour, which are admittedly reading a much smaller span of time, (hours versus years,) but are in units 1,000 times smaller than the “milli”sievert international units described above. This is important.)
However, instead of running for the hills just yet, let’s take a look at what the numbers actually say.
The March 15th hydrogen explosion at the plant, which occured roughly 84 hours after the earthquake, shows the largest spike of activity: for a brief period upwards of nearly 12,000 microsieverts per hour.
But let’s take this apart. What does that mean? 12,000 microsieverts is the same as 12 millisieverts. 12 millisieverts is the same as 1,200 millirem.
Now, compare this to the above list of natural radiation values, with an eye toward the annual average does of 360 millirem.
Yes, if reading correctly, this implies that simply standing on planet Earth every year nets everyone the same external radiation dose that would have been received if standing at the gates of the Fukushima Daichi powerplant during the worst part of the disaster for a full 15 minutes.
With these, even worst-case numbers, it becomes obvious that one could stand at the entrance to Fukushima during the worst period of the disaster for a full three minutes and have earned only the equivalent radiation dose of… an average chest x-ray.
Granted, this isn’t something one would necessarily want. This is upwards of 15% of your normal average dose. -But your biology wouldn’t ever notice the difference. And one could go many orders of magnitude more than that before there would be any reasonable expectation of an acute health effect.
More realistically, even standing at the Fukushima gates during the unprecedented event of external venting from the internal containment of reactor number 2, (with an exposure rate of 0.5 millisievert per hour), it’s a full hour of loitering there before one would rack up the external exposure of simple set of dental x-rays.
Funny how the perception and the reality differ, eh?
Unwanted radioactive material is serious, just as a leak from underground gasoline storage tanks that could contaminate drinking water is serious. But that seriousness must be given honest context.
Hopefully this has provided a window into the reality of radiation protection, and it is my sincere wish that this was and will continue to be a useful go-to when radiation numbers come up in the media.
Feedback is welcome, and if desired, I would be happy to put other radiation values in context… (Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, going to the Moon, etc.)
Go forth and combat radiation misinformation!